There’s a space inside the moon “Noah’s Ark” and someone left it a long time ago
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) categorically rejects suggestions that our Moon is not solid, but initiatives funded by the space agency indicate a continuing interest in the composition of its interior.
The routine discovery of hundreds of skylights on the lunar surface (holes in the Moon through which cavernous tunnels can be seen) recently led NASA to sponsor the development of robotic mini-rovers designed to image and study extraterrestrial vents.
The authors of a study published in the October 2020 issue of Earth-Science Reviews calculated the size of these huge lunar cavities. The results showed that many of these underground cavities are hundreds of times larger than anything that can be seen on Earth. According to the head of the study, one of the large lunar tunnels “could easily accommodate a small city within its walls”.
Together, these events revived speculation about the Moon’s true composition and internal structure.
The idea that Earth’s closest space neighbor might be empty has had its fair share of adherents over the years.
The modern “hollow moon theory” dates back in part to a book published in 1966 by the eminent astronomer Carl Sagan and the Russian astrophysicist IS Shklovsky. His work “Intelligent Life in the Universe” contained a chapter on the curious nature of the moons that revolve around Mars – Phobos and Deimos.
According to their calculations, these objects had an unusually low density, which led them to ask: could they be “hard on the outside but hollow on the inside?”
The authors wondered whether an advanced Martian civilization might have created artificial satellites to function as low-gravity platforms. That orbital arrangement would allow them to launch missions into deep space more easily, an advantage that Earth’s moon also offers.
The grandfather of NASA’s rocket program, Dr. Wernher von Braun unwittingly fueled the Hollow Moon legend by writing an article for Popular Mechanics about the Apollo 13 mission’s plan to launch the 15-ton portion of a Saturn V rocket to the lunar surface.
This experiment was a continuation of the deliberate crash of the Apollo 12 lunar module, which resulted in the moon “ringing like a bell for nearly an hour, indicating some strange and otherworldly underground structure.”
Even though Apollo 13 did not land on the moon, they were able to deliver a payload for the experiment with results similar to the lunar jolt from the previous impact.
Mission Control informed the Apollo 13 crew of their success: “Looks like your booster just hit the moon and is rocking a little.” This suggestive phrase has provided fodder for theorists who argue that the Moon may be mostly hollow.
The Mysterious Phobos Monolith
Based on Sagan’s earlier musings on the nature of Martian moons, two Russian scientists, Vasin and Shcherbakov, suggested that the Moon’s characteristics could be resolved with a logical explanation: “The Moon is an artificial hollow object – a satellite that was specially placed close to our planet by a highly developed extraterrestrial civilization”.
The Soviet duo published their thoughts on the matter in a 1970 paper entitled “Is the Moon a Creation of Alien Intelligence?”. His circumstantial assumptions about a satellite created by aliens paved the way for what became known as the “lunar spacecraft hypothesis”.
One of the first to understand this hypothesis was researcher and author Don Wilson. He outlined his hypothesis of an artificial satellite orbiting Earth in two books – “Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon” (1975) and “Secrets of Our Spaceship Moon” (1979).
Wilson cited anomalies such as shallow lunar craters (the strong hull that protects the Lunar craft prevents meteors from penetrating deeply) and the presence of strange structures and lights on the surface (evidence of artificial vehicles and navigational markers) as evidence that the Moon does not existed. . formed naturally.
Inspired by the “Soviet spaceship theory” of Vasin and Shcherbakov, Wilson agreed that the Moon was an ancient alien spacecraft. This called for it to be basically a hollow vehicle – especially considering the size of the intended payload: “The massive spacecraft carried everything necessary to serve as a sort of Noah’s Ark for sentient beings on their journey across the universe.”
Interestingly, Wilson mentioned the existence of lunar features that are like skylights. He referred to the work of amateur astronomer Dr. HP Wilkins, who was convinced that “within the Moon there really are vast hollow regions, perhaps in the form of caves, and which are connected to the surface by huge holes or pits”.
Wilson suggested that these “pits” could be the entrances to “hidden underground bases located inside the Moon”.
Another book, written in the same vein as Wilson, was collected by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler. In the book “Who Built the Moon? ” (2005) the authors note many “unrealistic coincidences” between the Moon, Sun and Earth (for example, the exact dimensions needed by the Moon for a solar eclipse or Earth’s tidal regulation) and insist that our satellite planet was created on purpose.
In contrast to Wilson’s conclusion that the Moon was a “cosmic Noah’s Ark” that was brought to its current location from outside our solar system, Butler and Knight suggest that it was fabricated by Earth-based architects using available elements. from the planet. .
It is claimed that this is why tests of materials on the lunar surface have shown that its composition is extremely similar to that of Earth.
As for who owns the plans for the artificial moon, in an interview with New Dawn, Knight elaborated on three possibilities:
“Aliens from God or humans. The only one that is 100% scientifically possible is the last one. Time travel is generally accepted to be physically possible and several scientists are close to sending matter into the past. We can assume that in the future machines can be created that can be sent back to remove matter from the young Earth to build the Moon – perhaps using mini black hole technology.”
Some of the mysteries surrounding the Moon’s formation may eventually be answered with investment in robust autonomous robots. New rovers are being developed specifically for underground exploration of dark lunar crevices. Today’s prototypes are capable of popping out of gaping alien mouths and are equipped with high-resolution imaging equipment.
One of the advanced models was tested in a crater in Utah in preparation for future lunar research. The unmanned lunar module named by its creators at Carnegie Mellon University PitRanger, was designed to collect photos of the funnel from various angles and get a complete picture of the situation on Earth.
Gaining a more detailed understanding of these subterranean portals could greatly expand our understanding of how the Moon works. With any luck, some of these rovers could be deployed as early as 2022 and should be seriously considered as part of NASA’s Artemis lunar missions.
It may not be an ancient hollow alien spacecraft, but the origin of the moon is still unclear from a scientific point of view. It makes sense that a concerted effort is being made to send rovers to explore underground tunnels on the Moon, not just because of their base building value, but also because of the trove of data they likely have on how bodies formed on the Moon. Moon. . Moon.
If the soon-to-be-explored lunar tunnels extend far below the surface, they could help explain some of the moon’s oft-cited anomalies and provide access to secrets buried beneath the regolith.
As evidenced by the growing interest in robots capable of penetrating sublunar cavities and lunar exploration, even if hollow moon theories don’t excite NASA officials, they do generate interest.